[plumi-discuss] blog.plumi.org / www.plumi.org / trac.plumi.org

[musicman]

That was because at the time, 2.5.4 seemingly (to me) was only
released as a patch on 2.5.3. I will rectify after breakfast :)

cheers
L.

On Dec 13, 2007 7:43 AM, andy nicholson <andy at engagemedia.org> wrote:
>
> yes i appreciate that fact, but somebody added a note at the bottom of
> the page about later versions?
>
> I am trying to tease out the (incorrect ;) reasoning for why people are
> recommending old, unsafe versions , rather than just updating to the
> latest minor version of plone.
> Minor version updates to plone can be recommended for use with plumi,
> immediately.
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 07:32 +1100, musicman wrote:
> > Becuase the text on that blog are over a month old.
> >
> > Dude, come on. Of *course* when it was written it was up to date,  but
> > the blog is kinda in limbo - the blogroll is a bit wonky, we are
> > waiting for 0.2 to launch it, and there is still debate about
> > moving/redirecting it to plumi.org (did you see anna's email
> > yesterday?)
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > L.
> >
> > On Dec 13, 2007 12:41 AM, andy nicholson <andy at engagemedia.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Why on this page
> > > http://blog.plumi.org/download/
> > >
> > > are people pointing to plone 2.5.3 ? That release has major security
> > > holes, the correct release is 2.5.5
> > >
> > > http://plone.org/products/plone/releases/2.5.5
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:49 +1100, and wrote:
> > > > there is also plumi.tv and plumi.net that should do the same thing as
> > > > specced out below.
> > > > and.
> > > >
> > > > On 12/12/2007, at 5:44 PM, anna at engagemedia.org wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > hey,
> > > > >
> > > > > so the Plumi brochure site is looking ready to go:
> > > > > http://blog.plumi.org
> > > > >
> > > > > we want to make this the first site that people visit looking for info
> > > > > about Plumi, with links to our Trac site for developers to peruse.
> > > > >
> > > > > we are left with the question of how to resolve the fact that we want
> > > > > people visiting:
> > > > > http://plumi.org
> > > > > and
> > > > > http://www.plumi.org
> > > > > to goto the blog rather than Trac.
> > > > >
> > > > > here is my proposal:
> > > > >
> > > > > the INDEX for
> > > > > http://plumi.org
> > > > > and
> > > > > http://www.plumi.org
> > > > > is REDIRECTED instantly to:
> > > > > http://blog.plumi.org
> > > > >
> > > > > all other Trac pages continue to reside on e.g.
> > > > > http://plumi.org/reports/8 etc. etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > does this side-step the issue of moving the Trac site to
> > > > > trac.plumi.org
> > > > > and causing broken links where it has already been linked to on the
> > > > > web,
> > > > > plus also the issue of moving the whole blog to www./plumi.org and
> > > > > having potential conflicts due to shared namespaces?
> > > > >
> > > > > if people can agree on this or propose another route to take soon,
> > > > > that
> > > > > would be great as it is all ready to go and would be good to get out
> > > > > there asap.
> > > > >
> > > > > cheers,
> > > > > anna
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Discuss mailing list
> > > > > Discuss at lists.plumi.org
> > > > > http://lists.plumi.org/listinfo/discuss
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Discuss mailing list
> > > > Discuss at lists.plumi.org
> > > > http://lists.plumi.org/listinfo/discuss
> > > --
> > > Andy Nicholson
> > >
> > > +44 774 733 4891 [ .uk ]
> > >
> > > +61 406 306 715 [ .au ]
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Discuss mailing list
> > > Discuss at lists.plumi.org
> > > http://lists.plumi.org/listinfo/discuss
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> --
> Andy Nicholson
>
> +44 774 733 4891 [ .uk ]
>
> +61 406 306 715 [ .au ]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.plumi.org
> http://lists.plumi.org/listinfo/discuss
>
>



-- 
 If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?
Will Rogers (1879 - 1935)