[plumi-discuss] reusing plumi .. some changes needed

[Andrew Lowenthal]

<snip>

On 4/09/11 1:12 AM, Rok Garbas wrote:
>> If you look at milestone 4.5 in particular some of the issues are there
>> http://plumi.org/report/3, but they are also dotted throughout the tracker.
>>
> I see that some of the features you planned for 4.5 I would already
> need. I guess haviing them earlier it wouldn't be a problem, right?
Only if it brings in additional bugs, but if it's modular I really can't 
see it being an issue. What were you thinking in particular?

And.