[plumi-discuss] reusing plumi .. some changes needed

[Rok Garbas]

On 04/09/11 15:49, Dimitris Moraitis wrote:
>> Another question, regarding transcoding daemon. What there any specific
>> > reason you didn't went with socket.io to get back the info when video is
>> > transcoded? I might have few hours this weekend to play with idea of
>> > using socket.io+pyramid+celery as a transcoding daemon.
> Sounds like a good plan. I don't think socket.io was available back when we first released the first version of transcode daemon after the Budapest Plone conference & sprint. 
> 
> We gave a shot a few months ago at refactoring the daemon using Celery and RabbitMQ but it turned out that it would require much more time than was allocated to the task in order to do it in a sane and backwards compatible way, so we dropped it.
> 
> Let me know if you release any code in that direction. I'd be happy to try it out.


as all weekends also this one was too short to do anything more then i
planned.

great ... i think we share same ideas and i would definitely like to
hear more what were the problems (especially to be backwards compatible).